WATER FLUORIDATION – HUMAN RATS AND COCKROACHES

Truth suddenly dawned on me. Governments are mass doping people with a substance which is a product of the fertilizer industry, which is defined as a poison in the UK’s Poison Act of 1972. A 1995 Forsyth Research Institute study found that rats who ingested this substance exhibited ‘abnormal behavior’. A ‘Neuroscientific and Behavioral Review’ article, 1992, showed this substance inhibited rats’ memory by disrupting hippocampal activity. A conclusion was that ‘changes in behavioral function will be comparable across species, especially humans and rats’. Another conclusion was that this substance had ‘a potential for motor dysfunction, IQ deficits and/or learning disabilities in humans’.

Other studies implicate this substance with weakening the immune system, damaging the kidneys and liver; causing fatigue, muscle pain, nausea, diarrhea, sickness, abdominal pain, increased thirst, memory loss, and insomnia. It can also act as a catalyst, carrying aluminum across the blood brain barrier, where it can be responsible for lower I. Q.

This substance has been used in England and the America for cockroach control before 1900. Experiments determined that when a cockroach walked over this substance, some of the powder attached to the lower part of the body, antennae, and feet. The cockroach attempts to clean the powder from its body by licking it, which brings it into its mouth, where it is swallowed. Death occurs in five to ten days.

This substance does not occur naturally. It is a product of the phosphate mining industry. It is not a waste product, it is processed as a source of extra revenue. Typically, a calcium mineral called apatite rock is ground up and infused with sulphuric acid, producing phosphoric acid and gas emissions. These gases are ‘captured’ by recovery units and condensed into 23% fluorosilicic acid. Sodium fluoride and sodium fluorosilicate are made from this acid. These chemicals are classified as hazardous waste by the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and must be labelled as poison, and only handled if wearing industrial safety clothing. Sodium fluoride is a white, odourless powder – like pure heroin – and is more expensive than the other compounds, hence, a 1992 census found 63% of the American population received water fluoridated with hexafluorosilicic acid, 28% with sodium silcofluoride, and 9% with sodium fluoride. The cheapest fix principle.

The more expensive sodium fluoride is, however, very versatile. It can be used to make sarin, the highly toxic nerve gas. Between 2004 and 2010, the UK Government issued export licences which allowed companies to sell it to Syria, in clear breach of international protocols on the trade in dangerous substances.

UK apologists for fluoridation of water supply boast that ‘only two compounds of fluoride are permitted for artificial fluoridation in the UK’ – no prizes for guessing which two! – hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silcofluoride. Their propaganda implies that these are the safest choices and ‘are manufactured to exacting quality standards’, which ‘meet Department of the Environment purity specifications’. It’s so reassuring to know we are only swallowing the ‘pure stuff’. The UK government’s mouth-piece, NHS Choices, misleads the public when it implies that the fluoride added to water ‘is a naturally occurring mineral found in water in varying amounts’. Like the EPA, it does not distinguish between two types of fluoride. Naturally occurring fluoride in hard water areas is calcium fluoride. Calcium and fluoride bond well and are not easily absorbed by your body, whilst hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silcofluoride are absorbed at a far greater rate. Natural calcium fluoride is consequently much less toxic than these synthesised fluorides.

Somewhat predictably, NHS Choices ‘has been certified as a producer of reliable health and social care information by The Information Standard – a certification scheme for health and social care information. It has been established by the Department of Health to help patients and the public make informed choices about their lifestyle, their condition and their options for treatment and care’. Orwell’s Ministry of Truth lives on. They misinform the public: ‘Over the past 50 years, there have been several reviews of the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation schemes’, then give their selection of these ‘reviews’, none of which mention such views as expressed by the chemist Dr. J. William Hirzy: ‘If this stuff gets out into the air, it’s a pollutant; if it gets into the river, it’s a pollutant; if it gets into the lake, it’s a pollutant; but if it goes right straight into your drinking water system, it’s not a pollutant. That’s amazing’.

Synthesised fluorides are released into the water supply of millions of people, both in America and the UK, under the pretext of saving children’s teeth from cavities, something a healthy diet could achieve.

Sodium fluoride is present in toothpaste, in the form of sodium monofluorophosphate. In the above quoted study, hippocampal selectivity was disrupted when adult female rats were exposed for 6 weeks to 100 ppm fluoride – toothpaste is ten times stronger.

You come in contact with fluoridated water when showering, washing dishes, washing clothes, and swimming in pools. The very youngest experience its delights when ingesting baby milk formula made with fluoride-added water. Commercial beverages are made using this water.

People are nothing more than toxic waste disposal systems. Big business profits with the collusion of governments who seek the calm submission of the masses. Follow the money to get to the truth.

You will not find tests for fluoride toxicity in your local hospital. The custodians of your health claim that the small levels of fluoride in water are safe. This is the ‘druidic’ principle. The Druids knew the small amount of deadly nightshade to use as a medicine without it proving fatally toxic. The difference is that the Druids did not advocate using deadly nightshade over a lifetime, or to give it to everyone.

As in America, people in the the UK have not been given the opportunity to vote on whether they want fluoride in their water; people, you see, can not be trusted to make the ‘right choice’ – the one government wants them to make. Yet, other countries ban its use. Holland’s Ministry of Health discontinued fluoridation after considering the double-blind tests of Dr. H. Moolenburg, which found 8 side effects of fluoride, only one of which was sufficient to ban its use.

In 1992, the DVGW (German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water) issued a statement on water fluoridation: (1) ‘It is not the task of water supply companies to add substances to drinking water intended as prophylactics against illness not caused by drinking water’. (2) ‘Caries is not the manifestation of fluoride deficiency, but is the result of a generally false nutrition and inefficient dental hygiene. Unwholesome habits resulting in caries are not eliminated by the fluoridation of drinking water; on the contrary, they are promoted’. (3) ‘The suggested optimal fluoride concentration of 1 mg per litre is very close to the dose with which long term detrimental effects in people cannot be excluded. . . the limit value in drinking water cannot be justified in view of different habits and therefore differing consumption of drinking water and the uncontrolled intake of fluorides from other sources. The safety of a lifelong accumulation of fluoride in the human body as a result of increased intake is disputed in medical science throughout the world’. (4) ‘More than 99 per cent [of fluoride contained in drinking water] would be discharged with waste water directly into the environment. This additional fluoride emission into waters is unacceptable for ecological reasons’. (5) ‘The consumer cannot avoid fluoridated drinking water made available by public water supply. This mandatory intake of fluoride violates the basic right to bodily freedom from injury . . . provided by the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany’. (6) ‘Fluoride intake for the prevention of caries is more effective with specific measures taken by the individual than by fluoridation of drinking water’ (7) ‘An assessment of risks vs. benefits involving both the health aspects and ecological consequences justifies DVGW’s rejection of the fluoridation of drinking water’. (My italics).

On behalf of the American and UK public, I challenge the EPA and NHS Choices to inform us on what basis they refute DVGW conclusions. In the case of the UK government’s propagandist, a reply will not be forthcoming, for they are always right, and they have a (government) certificate to prove it.

In 2011, a UK High Court Judge pronounced in favour of the Southampton Health Authority (SHA) to use fluoride, saying that ‘our democratic Parliament decided long ago that water can, in certain circumstances, be fluoridated’. He added: ‘This SHA have not acted unlawfully and no court can interfere with their decision’. The law had been changed to give regional health authorities the responsibility of treating water, a former responsibility of water companies. It is thought that health authorities are more likely to support fluoridation, and, given the half-truths and selective research given out by NHS Choices, absurdly validated by a ‘certificate of truth’, this is most likely. It can be added, UK politicians did not electioneer on a policy of fluoridation – the policy came after they were elected, by less than 25% of the electorate – ‘our (not so) democratic Parliament’.

I suggest that American and UK governments do, indeed, have a special relationship – they are united in treating their citizens with utter contempt. I further suggest that citizens of this dictatorial alliance unite, echoing the sentiments of Thomas Paine: ‘The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government’, which is a moral necessity, for: ‘If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace’.

In the ‘Brave New World’ of Aldous Huxley, written in 1932, people avoided facing the reality of their sad life, and routinely used of the drug soma to escape into a world of happy hallucinations. The epidemic use of heroin, pain killers, antipsychotics, and alcohol, aided by sodium fluoride contamination, is our equivalent. Add this to other forms of mass control envisioned by Huxley – addictive entertainment machines; endless propaganda dressed as education curriculum – and this becomes the perfect mix for the control of human rats and cockroaches.

Lenin Nightingale 2014

Advertisements

About leninnightingale

A nurse who for decades challenged the nursing establishment, echoing the voices of the silent many- the downtrodden nurses, students, care assistants, patients, and relatives that the 'system' overlooks. This site will present issues that many fear to engage in, prefering to believe what they are told by the Government's 'Ministry of Truth' (i.e. 'Lies').
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to WATER FLUORIDATION – HUMAN RATS AND COCKROACHES

  1. Pingback: FRACKING CHEMICALS | LENIN2U

  2. Pingback: Fracking Chemicals

  3. Carol Dimon says:

    http://livingtraditionally.com/us-government-admits-americans-have-been-overdosed-on-fluoride/ ackMarchAgainstMonsanto facebook – see them for further updates

  4. Carol Dimon says:

    Update- fluoride banned in Israel (ack trutherbotred twitter) http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/09/09/israel-bans-fluoride.aspx

  5. Carol Dimon says:

    Imported fuoride from China is even worse- “contaminated with heavy metals ” ack March against Monsanto http://livingtraditionally.com/your-fluoride-comes-from-china-and-its-laced-with-heavy-metals/

  6. Carol Dimon says:

    http://althealthworks.com/2262/fluoride-officially-classified-as-a-neurotoxin-by-worlds-most-prestigious-medical-journal/ via March Against Monsanto
    Remember- it is man-made fluoride that is the pprblem.

  7. Carol Dimon says:
  8. Herve says:

    Thanks for your article. I find it really difficult to live without fluoride in UK. For instance it’s practically impossible to find fluoride-free toothpaste in the supermarkets.

  9. Pingback: Environmental Horrors | NURSE BLOG INTERNATIONAL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s